Marketing No Comments

Newmarket Investment Landlord Hit With £33,000 Fine For 15 Charges

A rogue Newmarket landlord has been told he must pay almost £33,000 after being found guilty of 15 charges, 13 of which were under the Housing Act 2004.

Russell Wayne Price, of Lisburn Road, Newmarket, was prosecuted by Forest Heath District Council. The remaining charges not under the Housing Act related to Price’s failure to provide information when requested pertaining to his rental properties. At an earlier hearing he denied all charges.

The charges related to two properties in Lisburn Road, Newmarket, that were let as Houses in Multiple Occupation (HMOs). Both properties were inspected in December 2016. They had each been subject to Prohibition Orders served in 2008 and 2009, banning their use as HMOs. Upon inspection, several safety concerns were revealed. They ranged from a lack of gas or electrical safety certificates to a loose electrical socket. Exposed pipework, stairs without a handrail, damp and mould were also discovered. Neither property was deemed to be habitable.

Price was found guilty of all 15 charges following a three-day trial. He was ordered to pay charges and fines totalling £25,900. He must also pay the council’s costs in bringing the prosecution which brought the total to £32,980.

District Judge Timothy King commented on the case: ‘There was a significant risk of harm to individuals.’

Forest Heath’s cabinet member for housing, Councillor Sara Mildmay-White, said: “This should serve as a warning to any other rogue landlords across west Suffolk. Mr Price cut corners and didn’t provided safe accommodation to his tenants. In doing so he put their health and wellbeing at risk and jeopardised their safety. That is why I welcome the outcome of this case which sends a strong message to other rogue landlords. The safety of their tenants – our residents – is of paramount importance. They should not be exposed to inadequate fire safety, and the other health risks that this rogue landlord allowed. It is down to the hard work and perseverance of our housing enforcement team and the shared legal team, that we have achieved this result. I know that the vast majority of our landlords across west Suffolk are conscientious and work very hard to maintain housing standards for their tenants. That is why it is important that we take action against those few that don’t.’

Source: Residential Landlord

Marketing No Comments

Property Portfolio Riddled With Problems Lands Landlord With Fine

A landlord has been landed with a £6,439 fine after four of the homes in his £1.5 million property portfolio were found to pose safety concerns.

Magistrates inspected two of the homes let by landlord Dilip Gohil, 67. They found that they posed fire safety concerns, and lacked escape routes in case of a fire.

Furthermore, none of the homes in the property portfolio were licensed with Nottingham City Council. According to Sarah Mills, prosecuting, the authority sent out letters informing landlords that houses in multiple occupation (HMO) required five-year licences, costing £910.

A three story house in The Meadows was found by council officers to contain seven bedrooms with five tenants who shared a kitchen and a bathroom. The property did not have the correct licensing for a HMO. A second property, also located in The Meadows, had six bedrooms with three tenants, each paying around £70 per week for a room. It also did not have a licence and contained several fire safety threats.

Miss Mills explained to the court: ‘There was a lack of fire doors throughout the property, the kitchen door did not have a handle and could not be closed. There was a fridge stored in the hallway which provided access to the bathroom, kitchen and rear door.’

A further property owned by Gohil was located in Wilford Crescent East. Inspectors found a six-bedroom house without a licence, and with issues such as a kitchen door that failed to close, which affected the integrity of the fire door and its ability to contain fire and smoke for 30 minutes’ according to Miss Mills.

A final house on the street owned by Gohil also had no licence and issues with fire detectors.

Miss Mills concluded: ‘A large refrigerator was in the hallway outside the kitchen. Smoke detectors were not linked so occupants on the first and second floor would not receive adequate early warning in the event of a fire.”

Gohil admitted to seven breaches of the Housing Act and was fined £4,750. He was also ordered to pay £1,519 council costs and a government tax of £170.

John Campbell, mitigating, told magistrates: ‘He has rectified all the matters subject of these offences. He has applied for licences for all the properties. He didn’t need to be prosecuted to leap into action. The purpose is to maintain standards and safety and that has been served.’

Source: Residential Landlord

Marketing No Comments

Armley: New flats recommended for approval, despite concerns

Plans to turn a family home in Armley into a house into three flats could be approved by councillors next week, despite local concerns.

Applicant L&L Capital wants to turn the five-bedroom property into three individual flats at 4 Brentwood Terrace. The flats would create seven bed spaces between them.

brentwood terrace armley LS12

Image: Google Maps

Five local residents have objected as well as the three Armley ward councillors, who maintain there are too many flats and houses in multiple occupation (HMOs) being let out to single people, which leads to an increase in anti-social behaviour and noise.

A planning officer’s report recommends approval and concludes:

“Taking all relevant matters into account including the development plan and all representations received, the principle of the development on this site within the immediate location is considered to be acceptable in policy and planning terms and the impact is residential amenity is not considered to be, on balance unduly harmed.”

The south and west plans panel meets at Leeds Civic Hall next Thursday, 7 December, at Leeds Civic Hall, starting at 1pm. The agenda, and reports, can be read in full here.

The Dispatch has been following issues with shared housing (HMOs) and flats in Armley in recent months. Last month we reported a landmark decision to refuse planning permission for a shared house in Armley would be challenged after the developer launched an appeal.

Source: West Leeds Dispatch

Marketing No Comments

Potters Bar Landlord Fined Nearly £7,000 For Failing To Obtain HMO Licence

A Potters Bar landlord is facing a fine of nearly £7,000 after he failed to obtain the correct HMO licence for his rental property.

Andrew Harvey avoided paying the £500 licence fee, leaving him with a bill of over ten times this when Hertsmere Borough Council bought legal action against him.

Harvey appeared at St Alban’s Magistrates Court on Wednesday 22 November due to his failure to obtain a HMO Licence for the rental property he let, located on Oakfield Close. The property had been operating without a licence from March 2012 to June 2017. The court was told that Harvey, 50, from Stevenage, avoided all contact from the borough council, failing to respond to emails and other correspondence on multiple occasions. Harvey defended himself by claiming that he had not received the emails from the council.

When sentencing the Potters Bar landlord, magistrates said they believed Harvey should have been aware anyway that his property was meant to be licenced. It was therefore his duty to ensure that the correct licensing for the property had been obtained.

It is a criminal offence for anyone to control or manage a house with three or more storeys which is occupied by five or more people in more than one household without a licence.

An inspection by the council’s private sector housing officer in June revealed five veterinary students living in the home.

Harvey was fined £5,542 and was also ordered to pay £1,319.29 in costs, as well a £125 victim surcharge.

A House in Multiple Occupation licence costs just £542 for five years, proving that in aiming to avoid the licence fee Harvey was in fact subjecting hiself to a far higher fare.

Portfolio holder for housing, Councillor Jean Heywood, said: ‘Everybody has a right to live in decent accommodation, and the council takes its responsibilities to enforce basic living standards very seriously. As a landlord, you are responsible for the welfare of your tenants and there are strict rules in place to ensure certain conditions and duties are met. This is for the protection of all. The vast majority of landlords are happy to work with us to ensure they are managing their properties and looking after their tenants according to the letter of law. However, we will not hesitate to take other landlords who deliberately fail in their duties to court, where they could receive unlimited fines.’

Source: Residential Landlord

Marketing No Comments

Demand for buy-to-let property in North West is soaring

Demand for buy-to-let property in the North West has soared by 38 per cent year on year, according to the Mistoria Group.

Cities and towns are proving to offer the best opportunities, with yields of 7.08 per cent in Salford, 5.96 per cent in Leeds and 5.79 per cent in Manchester, new research by the specialists in investment property shows.

Manchester is in the Top 10 buy-to-let postcodes in the UK, with rental price growth of 7.53 per cent and yields of 6.11 per cent.

The resilience of the property market in the North West has been boosted by regeneration which has bought new jobs, transport links and a range of large housing projects.

Mish Liyanage, managing director of the Mistoria Group, said: “The housing market in the North West is stable, proving the strength of the property market and economy as a whole, in this region.

“The Northern Powerhouse offers investors unbeatable buy-to-let opportunities, way ahead of London and the South East. Affordable property prices and a booming economy is drawing students, families and professionals to the region.”

HMOs in Liverpool and Salford are proving popular with investors, as both cities have a high population of students and young professionals.

Because Article 4 is not in operation in these cities, investors are able  convert a family home, or a home used by a single person (C3 -dwelling house/flat) to a small shared house of up to six unrelated individuals (C4 –HMO), without any planning permission.

A HMO property can deliver landlords an average gross rental yield of 13 per cent before any charges and voids.

A three bed HMO for three students, which can be bought from £120,000 in Liverpool, will see gross rent on the property in excess of £1,235 pcm.

Source: Simple Landlords

Marketing No Comments

Council plans crackdown on HMOs in the Dales

Plans to crack down on the number of HMOs (House in Multiple Occupation) in the Dales neighbourhood of Smithdown have been revealed.

Liverpool City Council says the over concentration of shared housing is impacting on the lives of local residents with noise complaints and anti-social behaviour (ASB) incidents above the city average.

Currently, no planning application for a change of use from a house to HMO for up to six people is required as planning permission for such a change is automatically granted.

Council evidence shows that the Dales neighbourhood, bounded by Wellington Road/Gainsborough Road, Smithdown Road, and the West Coast Main railway, has a higher than average concentration of HMOs (39%) and that this is adversely impacting on local residents’ quality of life.

Between April 2015 and October 2017, there were 275 complaints to the council’s noise team; whilst between April 2014 and February 2017, there were 360 ASB incidents reported to the police.

Almost 80% of the properties on one road, Borrowdale Road, are listed as HMOs.

To combat the situation, the council wants to use an Article 4 Direction to remove permitted development rights that allow a change of use from class C3 (Dwelling House) to C4 (HMO for up to six persons) to happen without the need for planning consent.

The Direction is recommended for approval at a meeting of the council’s cabinet this Friday (24 November).

Source: Your Move Magazine

Marketing No Comments

Should student landlords offer All-Inclusive Bills in 2018?

An increasing amount of student landlords are becoming attracted to the idea of an all-inclusive rent package because it allows them to forecast their outgoings more precisely, and it makes their life simpler. If you’re a landlord who’s considering an all-inclusive rent offer for the 18/19 academic cycle (or even to young professionals in a shared house) but you’re’ concerned it’ll leave you out of pocket and take up more of your already limited time, fear not!

These days, HMO management is all about efficiency and value for money and students do expect to pay a little bit more for this hands off and time saving inclusion! But student landlords should not be left out of pocket, and there’s a way to manage it quickly and efficiently which should actually save you time in the long run! This article talks you through it, step by step!

Why do students want all-inclusive bills?

An all-inclusive rent takes a lot of the hassle out of HMO management for landlords, and also for student or professional tenants living in a HMO, where traditionally, tenants have had to set up their own utilities and waste precious minutes calculating who owes what! It’s undoubted that an all-inclusive rent is more attractive to the modern HMO tenant that’s used to fixed price mobile phone contracts, Netflix subscriptions, annual bus passes and the like. By offering a rent that includes many of the usual extra costs, all rolled into one handy, single monthly payment, student tenants can have a much better idea of how much pocket money they’ll be left with for the rest of the month. In my experience, you’ll increase the likelihood of getting a better caliber of student tenants who respects your property and your values as a landlord. Ultimately, and perhaps most importantly for them, it makes planning their shopping, 4G data spend, fancy dress costumes and 2 for 1 drinks nights (some of the well known student priorities) much easier!

What bills should you consider offering?

We run you through some of the options a landlord could include and suggest some considerations for each. If you do opt to include bills, ensure that you include a fair usage cap in each tenancy agreement, it’s just good HMO management practice. We also recommend that you inform tenants of their responsibilities regarding safe usage when they move in, along with the usual utility information such as emergency shut off valves and meter locations.

  1. Gas, Water Electricity – Consider switching regularly to take advantage of better rates and offers such as cash back and vouchers.
  2. Council Tax – Take on the responsibility of informing your council of your tenant’s details when they occupy the property. If they are students, they’ll be exempt from having to pay Council Tax, but if the council don’t get told, you could be on the wrong end of some aggressive enforcement letters!
  3. Broadband A high-speed and unlimited broadband service is essential for student tenants. If you are a portfolio owner, you can set up one account with a provider and installing a service at a new property is as easy as sending one email! Virgin and Sky both offer good landlord packages.
  4. TV License – If you supply a TV with your property (which is another essential for 2018) then you are responsible for this anyway. One quick call will make sure it’s in place, and pay annually because it will save you money.
  5. Sky, Virgin, Amazon, Netflix – If you really want to stand out from the crowd, consider some of these add-ons in your student house, but make sure you set limits, so you don’t experience unexpected bills!
  6. Cleaning – Having the shared areas cleaned every 2 weeks helps keep a student property in great shape and allows you to have someone regularly checking the condition of the property. It’ll give you an advantage when it comes to viewings too!
  7. Gardening – If you provide a garden or yard, you should consider getting a gardener to visit on a semi-regular basis. Not many HMO tenants own lawn mowers and secateurs! But keeping foliage trimmed will help make a good first impression on prospective new tenants, and more importantly, mums and dads.

How can you make bills more economic?

Besides shopping around for the best tariffs (try U-Switch to get started) some suppliers can send you a free ‘Smart Meter’ for the property which will allow your more economically minded student tenants to get a real time indication of their energy consumption and costs, and it will let you as a landlord, check their usage at any time, from anywhere in the world, from your phone. You could also install a smart heating control system such as Inspire that allows you to set pre-determined heating parameters. This will stop your tenants turning off the heating in the winter in an attempt to cut their costs (a sure fire way to get condensation and mould issues) or if you’re including the bills for them, it’ll stop them from blasting it all day every day at a huge and unnecessary cost.

What else can you do in a property?

Light Bulbs – Replacing just one old light bulb with an energy saving alternative can reduce lighting costs by up to £78 over the lifetime of the bulb. Plus they last up to 12 times longer than ordinary light bulbs.

Radiators – Fit reflector panels behind your radiators. These can reflect back into the room 95% of the heat energy radiated from the rear of your radiator. Other radiator extras are also available on the market such as Smart Radiator Valves which turn the radiator on and off at set times of the day, and radiator boosters that ‘suck’ heat in from your radiator and circulate it 50% more efficiently around your room.

Thermostat – As a rule of thumb, you can save around 3% on your heating bill for every degree that you turn down your thermostat. This is a balancing act of keeping your tenants happy, keeping your property warm enough to prevent condensation issues, and keeping bills economic.

Taps – A dripping hot water tap can waste enough hot water to fill half a bath in just one week, so fix any leaking taps!

Draft Proofing – Draft proofing windows, doors, loft hatches, wall and ceiling fittings can save the average property £55 per year on heating bills.

Provide a washing line – This is a real no brainer!

Fridges and freezers – Defrost these appliances annually, this helps them to run more efficiently. Bear in mind that some fridges and freezers self-defrost though, which saves you time and money in the long run!

Hot water tank – If you have a hot water tank, check that it is well insulated.

Cavity wall insulation – can save landlords around £150 a year, and the pay back will be approximately 5 years!

Loft Insulation – The approximate saving per year for those who have thick loft insulation installed is £175. Be sure you don’t compress the thickness of the insulation as this can see savings decrease dramatically. Installation can cost anywhere between £100 and £350 depending on the size of your property.

Under floor insulation – Older properties are more likely to have suspended timber floors. Timber floors can be insulated by lifting the floorboards and laying mineral wool insulation supported by netting between the joists. This can save you around £60 per year and cost as little as £100 if you do it yourself. Filling in the gaps between your floor and skirting board alone could save you £25 per year.

Solid wall insulation – Older houses tend to have solid walls rather than cavity walls. Having either internal or external insulation installed on your solid walls could save you around £445 to £475 per year. However, the cost of having such insulation installed can be high at £5,500 to £13,000. Nevertheless, external insulation can renew the appearance of your outer walls, improve weatherproofing and sound resistance, fills cracks and gaps in the brickwork, which will reduce draughts, increase the life of your walls by protecting the brickwork and reduce condensation on internal walls to help prevent damp (though it will not solve rising or penetrating damp).

Source: Property 118

Marketing No Comments

Houses in Multiple Occupation, two storeys or three?

Legislation relating to Houses in Multiple Occupation (HMO) has long existed to ensure landlords follow the necessary requirements when renting out properties to multiple people. All HMOs are subject to legislation about how they are managed and certain larger HMOs (3-storeys or more with 5 or more occupants) are required to have a license.

In the recent case of Woking BC v Johnson (unreported), 10 October 2017, (QB (Administrative Court)), a two-storey self-contained flat situated above a restaurant was occupied by more than five people who did not form part of the same household. Whilst it was clear that this was indeed an HMO, the question for the magistrates was whether the property fell within the description of an HMO, which was required under the statutory scheme to be licensed.

Article 3(3) of the Licensing of Houses in Multiple Occupation (Prescribed Descriptions) (England) Order 2006 (SI 2006/371) provides that a property requires a license where:

  • It is occupied by five or more people.
  • The HMO or any part of it comprises three storeys or more.
  • It is occupied by persons living in two or more households.

The local authority alleged that the respondent had committed an offence under section 72 of the Housing Act 2004 (HA 2004) by failing to obtain an HMO license in respect of the property. The local authority argued that the restaurant (below the flats) should be included within the number of storeys considered when calculating the requirements under Article 3(3). The magistrates relied on the decision in Islington LBC v Unite Group Plc [2013] EWHC 508 (Admin) in which it was decided that it was the HMO itself that had to comprise three storeys and not the building in which it was situated. The magistrates decided that the restaurant did not form part of the HMO and therefore did not require a license. The local authority appealed by way of case stated.

The issue for the High Court was whether the magistrates had been correct to exclude the restaurant when calculating the number of storeys.

The appeal was subsequently allowed by the High Court. It was held that the magistrates should not have relied on Islington LBC v Unite Group Plc as the circumstances differed to the present case. In Islington, the property comprised a five-storey block of purpose built self-contained flats. The ground floor consisted of a shop and the four upper floors were residential accommodation. Most such accommodation was in the form of cluster flats with four to six bedrooms with en-suite bathrooms and a communal living room and kitchen. Each flat was on one storey. The cluster flats were each a house in multiple occupation (HMO) within the meaning of the Housing Act 2004. In contrast, in the present case the property was a two-storey self-contained flat above a commercial premises.

The correct approach should have followed the explanatory note to the Licensing of Houses in Multiple Occupation (Prescribed Descriptions) (England) Order 2006, which requires that commercial premises above or below living accommodation, except where they were located in the basement, should count towards the calculation of storeys.

Source: Lexology

Marketing No Comments

Swanky student house does not have planning permission to be an HMO

A luxurious student house with seven double bedrooms and a hot tub does not have planning permission to take student tenants, the Bath Chronicle has discovered.

Fieldgate, a £6,000-a-month property on The Avenue next to the University of Bath, is advertised for students who want to live a life of luxury.

In Bath, landlords who want to change the use of their properties from from family homes to Houses of Multiple Occupation, or HMOs as they are more widely known, require planning permission from Bath and North East Somerset Council and an HMO licence depending on the type of property.

An HMO is a property rented to three or more individuals who are unrelated and share communal areas, such as a bathroom and kitchen.

Landlord Richard Fisher does not need a licence but does need planning permission to change the property’s use, which he has not yet sought.

planning permission
One bedroom comes with a balcony (Image: Upad)

He is not currently breaking council rules by advertising the home to students but would be if any were to move in.

The huge property is unlike a regular HMO – one bedroom comes with a balcony, there is a huge kitchen seating 14 people and a large garden perfect for “playing badminton”.

The advert on Upad.co.uk also specifies no deposit, guarantors, references or agent fees are required.

A spokesman for B&NES Council said that while it does not require an HMO licence, “it would still require planning permission” were students to move in.

You don't see a hot tub in every student house
You don’t see a hot tub in every student house (Image: Upad)

Fieldgate is also advertised on Airbnb for nearly £600 per night and can host up to 14 people.

The post reads: “Events and parties allowed only if you can convince me that you will look after the house and not annoy the neighbours with overly loud noise, especially after 10pm.”

After midnight the hot tub is out of bounds, but “there’s loads of room in the house of continued enjoyment”.

It is perfect for students as it is on the university's doorstep
It is perfect for students as it is on the university’s doorstep (Image: Upad)

“The neighbour opposite has been giving me some horror stories about guests shrieking with laughter, shouting, and even crying on their way to and from the taxi to the house and sometimes remaining outside to talk loudly on their phones, in the early hours and way after the neighbours have gone to bed at 10.30pm,” the post continued.

Richard Fisher, owner of Fieldgate, said the council confirmed the property does not require a HMO licence because it is only two-storeys, but he was unaware that he required planning permission.

“My intention is to not do anything which doesn’t have the right licence or planning consent.

“I run a very good establishment and I make sure everybody staying there is considerate for the neighbours.”

Source: Property Wire

Marketing No Comments

Developer challenges landmark Armley HMO decision

A landmark decision to refuse planning permission for a shared house in Armley is to be challenged after the developer launched an appeal.

In August councillors on Leeds City Council’s south and west plans panel turned down an application to turn a four-bedroom family terrace house in Conference Road into a house of multiple occupation (HMO) for four people.

They said the application, by Oakwood-based White Owl Properties Ltd, would alter the character of the area, that another HMO would affect community cohesion, cause parking problems and would lead to the loss of a much-needed family home.

But White Owl has now launched an appeal against the decision and the final decision on their proposals will be taken by an independent Government planning inspector.

Council planning officers had said there was not a high enough concentration of HMOs to the south of the railway line to turn down planning permission – but they arguments were overturned by councillors.

Applicant Sara Poskitt argued that she and her partner Sam Waterworth owned six properties between them and never had any noise problems with tenants. Ms Poskitt said that tenants were always vetted, that unemployed and DSS were not allowed and strict checks were in place.

The Planning Inspectorate says the appeal will be dealt with by the written representations procedure and the planning inspector will visit the site. No date has yet been given for the appeal.

Source: West Leeds Dispatch